Does mainstream Education really make us better
people?
Education
has an important role for people in general; it has been considered the
idea that
education guides us so to help each one to define themselves. However,
it is overestimated
because people through the education try to fit among the society. Many
people keep that idea that education makes people better, but it is just
an idea and not a fact. That is not to say that education does not help
because it have a huge purpose which is to make people producters of
money. Nevertheless, the part of the humanity is not centered during the
general learning process.
There are different perspectives in which anyone can see if education actually makes us better people, for instance since the profesional perspective; which totally education is more interested on. Another perspective is the humanistic, which there are many theories in which point out that a humanistic education is better. However, those theories are not taken into account and the educational system continue being the same as many years ago.
There are different perspectives in which anyone can see if education actually makes us better people, for instance since the profesional perspective; which totally education is more interested on. Another perspective is the humanistic, which there are many theories in which point out that a humanistic education is better. However, those theories are not taken into account and the educational system continue being the same as many years ago.
On one hand, education does not take into account the humanistic. Education was used in order to classify people as educated people and no educated people. People took advantage of it so to create new stereotypes and to start judging people according to their studies instead of the essence.
Besides, It is thought that people learn how to be a person at home during the first years. Parents are in charged to stablish a model and to shape their principles so as to become a good person. Though, as people spend most of their time studing, there is the recommended place in which some principles could be reinforced.
On the other hand, education encourage people the importance to be
professional. Since the
industrial revolution emerged, mainstream education decided to transform the
educational system such as the way to train people so as to make people to
produce money. In other words, the educational system become as a factory.
Moreover, mainstream Education was designed for a different age.Taking into account the
years, the necessities are totally different per each decade. When the education emerged, there was
not technology as there is nowadays. Besides there is totally wrong to keep following some steps that
maybe do not fit with the actual context.
Additionally, education make as better in the perspective of intellectual. Since anyone was born, they have the capacity to adquire as much knowledge as possible. And people usually get that information when they pass through the learning process.
As a
conclusion, mainstream education encourage people to get the required knowledge
in order to fit in an industrial context. However, there is not a special
formation focused on the basic principles in order to be considered as a
person.
Dear student,
ReplyDeleteBy reading your second version of this first draft of your paper, I must say I cannot identify clear ideas in regard to concepts such as mainstream education and critical education. Such differentiation is part of the insights given by Peter McLaren in his text "Critical Pedagogy: A look at the major concepts". I would suggest revising that material again to get a better understanding of the sort of discussion he provides in that regard.
In this line of thought, I highly recommend you to revise these concepts and quote different authors that help you guide the reader through your paper. Personally speaking, I do not think the discussion should be focused on the "conflicts" between these two approaches in education. On the contrary (and following McLaren's ideas), you should center on analyzing/exemplifying/pondering upon the advantages that adopting a critical pedagogy perspective in education benefits the formation of critical thinkers within our current societies. Making reference to the already analyzed types of knowledge (technical, practical and emancipatory knowledge) would help you give further ideas on what critical education should be and promote in our classrooms.
Think about the following aspects to re-direct the purpose of your paper:
* The role of the curriculum from the perspective of critical education
* Critical pedagogy as way to transform traditional education
* The role of culture within a critical pedagogy perspective in education.
Last but not least, I have shared with you a research article concerning critical pedagogy. Read it and make the necessary adjustments to your paper.
Best regards,
Jhon Losada